Inspect the data before modeling
Missing values, outliers, inconsistent units, wildly unbalanced group sizes. Left unaddressed, these make an elegant model confidently wrong.
Move from data checks and statistical models to charts and explanations with a reproducible analysis trail.
The usual worry about letting an AI analyze data is the same everywhere: it produced a number, and there is no way to tell where the number came from or whether it is right. A conclusion you cannot trace is a conclusion you cannot put in a paper or a report.
The research agent handles this by writing the analysis as code and running it. It writes a script, executes it against your data, reads the output, spots problems, fixes the script, and repeats until it runs clean. You receive the conclusion along with the code, intermediate output, and charts, so any step can be rerun and checked. That is the substantive difference from asking a model to work something out in prose: there the number is generated, here it is computed.
Missing values, outliers, inconsistent units, wildly unbalanced group sizes. Left unaddressed, these make an elegant model confidently wrong.
Every statistic comes from code that actually executed, not from the model recalling what such a figure usually looks like. Scripts and run logs are delivered alongside the results.
When a script errors or the output is implausible, it reads the traceback, locates the cause, edits, and reruns rather than submitting a broken result as the answer.
Axes, legends, units, and error bars are present, so charts can go straight into a paper or report without a formatting pass.
Here is my survey data. I want to know whether the three groups differ on these scales. You decide which test is appropriate.
A data quality report flagging two outliers, then the rationale for the chosen test, the results, post-hoc comparisons, and a publication-ready group comparison figure.
From this sales data, identify the main factors affecting conversion, and be clear about what is correlation and what can be argued as influence.
An analysis covering variable selection, model results, and robustness checks, explicitly separating statistical association from defensible influence, with full code attached.
Where the number comes from. Asked in prose, a model produces a plausible-looking figure from language probability. Here code runs against your real data, and you get the code and intermediate output to rerun yourself.
Common tabular formats including Excel and CSV, and multiple tables can be uploaded together for joined analysis. Large datasets are processed in chunks.
Charts and statistics can be used directly and the code works as supplementary material. Whether the method suits your research design, and how the conclusions are worded, remains your call.
No. Uploaded data is used only to complete the analysis you requested.